Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jay Chou's Golden Melody Awards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep but move somewhere. Discussion of exactly where can and should continue on the talk page. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:27, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Jay Chou's Golden Melody Awards[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Uh, what should we do with this article? It doesn't seem to be notable or encyclopedic enough to stand on its own as an article, and yet the material is substantially important that it should probably be somewhere — but the Jay Chou article is already a bit too long to accommodate a merger back there. I want some opinions here on whether it should be deleted or not. As for my own opinion, mild delete. --Nlu (talk) 18:42, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to List of awards and nominations received by Jay Chou and include any other awards he may win on the same page. The table should also be edited by removing the nominations received by Chou's lyricists, arrangers, video directors, etc. -- if he wasn't the nominee personally, the nomination doesn't belong in the table of his awards. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- neither the award itself, nor Jay Chou, have notability demonstrated in a reliable secondary source. If the artist is notable, this kind of minutia can go on that artist's page, if notability is shown.N2e (talk) 03:24, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Uh, Chou is clearly notable himself. --Nlu (talk) 05:14, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to List of awards and nominations received by Jay Chou as the main article is too long aleady and only has one paragraph titled "Accolades", which seems a bit inadequate, as the information is an indication of his recognition as an artist from the industry and his peers. Agree with Metropolitan90 that the page should then only include awards and nominations received by Chou. --Michaela den (talk) 13:26, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, m.o.p 14:41, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rename per Metropolitan90 and Michaela den and expand, as his article makes clear that he has received many other awards, including World Music Awards and awards for his acting. All of which makes this substantial enough to merit a standalone list. There's no reason why this list should have been limited to just one kind of award, and other such lists for actor/musicians include both musical and acting awards (e.g., Jennifer Lopez, Madonna, Judy Garland). postdlf (talk) 14:49, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rename - A list article of Chou's awards wold be a perfectly valid way to handle all his awards as the main article would be too long with this information. -- Whpq (talk) 15:51, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rename - as per others as I've seen lists of films or albums or awards listed as separate articles for other artist such as Fahrenheit. --Visik (talk) 05:42, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
merge it would do just as well in the main article. I'd even say that a listl ike this is a necessary part of the main article. Separating it out is a disservice to the reader. DGG ( talk ) 03:17, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per DGG; no need for this to be a separate article. Stifle (talk) 09:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.