Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jade Cargo International destinations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 14:22, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Jade Cargo International destinations[edit]

List of Jade Cargo International destinations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the 2018 RFC on airline destination lists. Per the subsequent AN discussion these should be nominated for deletion in orderly fashion.

I think the WP:NOT argument here is clear: this is essentially just a catalogue-listing of all of the services offered by a commerical enterprise. In this case, the article is listing the services of a cargo-shipping operation and not even a passenger airline per se.

Even if the WP:NOT issues could be dealt with somehow (and they are enough to warrant the deletion of this article), the article would remain a failure of WP:CORP since there are no sources at all cited in it. A BEFORE search is not necessary in a case like this, but for the avoidance of doubt I performed one and did not find anything that could rescue it - only fan-sites, specialist press, etc., none of which would pass the audience requirements of WP:CORP (this piece in Airways Magazine was possibly the best, but that's specialist press/a fan site).

Not bundling at present as bundling seems likely to be challenged. Bundling should only be proposed where unbundling is unlikely to be requested. FOARP (talk) 13:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation, Lists, and China. FOARP (talk) 13:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator, also the fact that the entire article is unsourced and sources to verify all of this content would prove difficult to find. I can see some merit in having lists of airline destinations for commercial passenger flights (so long as these are sourceable - and a lot indeed are), however not for cargo flights. Ajf773 (talk) 10:08, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the nominator and per WP:IINFO. Nythar (💬-🍀) 01:40, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.