Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Indian news satire websites

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 09:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of Indian news satire websites[edit]

List of Indian news satire websites (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTDIR, article has just two proper article links while the rest are external links for various non-notable websites. There doesn't seem to be much scope with this being more of a directory for various Indian comedy sites or blogs. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 18:08, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 18:03, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Not enough notable entries to justify this level of specificity. postdlf (talk) 15:37, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep There are long lists and short lists, but we do not restrict ourselves to the long ones. The number of entries necessary to justify a list is two. There are already two, and possibly some of the others can be shown to be notable. (And I think this is a case where if might provide appropriate brief coverage for any that are borderline notable) DGG ( talk ) 21:34, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.