The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Many title defense articles have been deleted, due to the fact they aren't that important. This is no different. RobJ1981 23:59, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 00:31, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per deletion of previous articles about wrestling title defenses. This kind of information is unencyclopedic fancruft. NeoChaosX (he shoots, he scores!) 00:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Tulkolahten 13:24, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
