Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2000 (WorldWide)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Big Dom 21:23, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2000 (WorldWide)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unreferenced pile of original research WuhWuzDat 18:13, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I don't know whether this is something that has sufficient notability, etc for inclusion, but everything does appear to be referenced, although all to the same mediaweek.de site, which claims copyright (although whether that is over the data, the design, or what is not clear). Thryduulf (talk) 18:17, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 18:30, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 18:30, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion. It would seem sensible to me to merge the discussion of this article together with the only other extant article in the set, currently being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 1999 (WorldWide). Which page is used is esentially an arbitrary choice as they are identical at this time. Thryduulf (talk) 19:15, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete See past discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United World Chart, of where these numbers come from and has been specifically discouraged as a source per WP:BADCHART. No real sources or discussion of where the numbers came from at all. Nate • (chatter) 04:29, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and especially not a WP:BADCHART archive. Stifle (talk) 16:38, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per WP:BADCHARTS and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United World Chart. Merging parallel discussions as well.—Kww(talk) 21:19, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.