Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of French marquisates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:24, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of French marquisates[edit]

List of French marquisates (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • This list is a original research
  • This list fails WP:NLIST : Notability of lists is based on the group. One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources and that is not the case.
  • The article fails to comply with WP:RS.
  • Article created by a Wikipedia:Single-purpose account who has always refused to put sources despite the requests made to him.
  • Unsourced for years for 90% of the content Noveli (talk) 17:31, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:52, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:52, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:53, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for may reasons : 1) original research 2) fails WP:NLIST (notability of lists is based on the group. One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources and that is not the case) 3) fails to comply with WP:RS (unsourced for for 90% of the content) 4) Article created by a Wikipedia:Single-purpose account who has always refused to put sources despite the requests made to him. --Noveli (talk) 23:03, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 19:31, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.