Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Filipino unknown supercentenarian claimers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by User:Fastily under criterion G6. (non admin closure) "Pepper" @ 00:46, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Filipino unknown supercentenarian claimers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List consisting of one (at most) valid entries. ThaddeusB (talk) 04:21, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with haste. Two items, one a redlink, is not a list. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:49, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. And even if this were considered a valid list, there are problems with the title, so if it doesn't get deleted, it needs to be renamed. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:17, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. —Ed!^(talk) 23:38, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.