Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Fake Facebook profiles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE Harr o5 23:48, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Fake Facebook profiles[edit]

This list does not meet guidelines for notability or importance. Furthermore, there is no way to cite any sources. The list could become extremely long as there are numerous fake profiles being created. This basically would end up being a list of celebrities, politicians, internet memes ("Limecat"), and other random fictional characters ("Captain Planet"). Sorry to spoil your fun, but this does not belong on Wikipedia. L1AM (talk) 00:50, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As Above. Tombride 00:54, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 00:59, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Harr o5 01:11, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above Makgraf 01:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unmaintainable, unencyclopedic. --Ryan Delaney ^talk 01:45, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Allen 01:46, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unencyclopedic. --Kinu ^t/_c 01:57, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. No way we could make this, and if we could, it'd be pointless. Noone could get to the profiles unless they were in that school and on facebook, and there is probably a pile and a half of duplicates. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ZachPruckowski (talk • contribs) 02:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. -- stillnotelf has a talk page 02:45, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination. -- BrownHairedGirl 04:25, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Hbackman 04:37, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 04:51, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:16, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. dcandeto 06:17, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't belong ~Linuxerist L / T 07:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unencyclopedic. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 07:50, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Hey, I actually have four of these that I can name! Alas, you could not verify that without a facebook account, more are created constantly, and probably no-one cares anyway except the author. Totally worthless and unencyclopedic. Grand master ka 07:59, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Icarus 08:01, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unverifiable and non-notable. Robin Johnson 10:15, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Ter e nc e Ong 10:36, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lankiveil 11:08, 20 March 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Delete as per nomination and everybody else. Jud e (talk,contribs,email) 11:46, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 14:29, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to uncyclepedia (if some current author wants it) JeffBurdges 15:41, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete listcruft.--Isotope23 17:54, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Andy123(talk) 19:45, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unencyclopedic. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 00:09, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete per nom. If it were to be completely full, it would waaaaaay too long. And since that will never happen, it will be waaaay incomplete. --Pal5017 03:01, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.