Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of F.E.A.R. characters and organizations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to F.E.A.R.. MBisanz talk 00:30, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of F.E.A.R. characters and organizations[edit]

List of F.E.A.R. characters and organizations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Largely unsourced video game trivia. Lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) Everything that needs to be said on this topic can be adequately covered in the appropriate sections of the series and individual game articles, but I frankly don't see anything sourced and worth merging. czar 22:52, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 22:53, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. czar 22:53, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The article does not establish notability. The main articles can easily handle core characters in either summary style or very brief lists without causing any size issues. TTN (talk) 23:35, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:06, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: This would be too much for an international best seller video game. No independent sources have been proffered, and I doubt any exist. Nha Trang Allons! 15:10, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect: As much I disagree with all the merging of character list articles lately, I'm not seeing quite enough coverage to have this one as its own article, as I've found barely anything in Google searches. However, this should be redirected, not deleted. Deletion should be a last resort, per WP:CHEAP and WP:ATD-R, as well as to preserve the content for any future potential the article may have. The character section at F.E.A.R. works as a target. Kokoro20 (talk) 22:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, does not meet WP:GNG. Characters in a notable franchise doesn't make the characters automatically notable. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 07:58, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.