Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Environmental disciplines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 08:49, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Environmental disciplines[edit]

Inapprop article name, stub article, poorly written, content covered more comprehensively elsewhere -- Alan Liefting-talk- 08:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reclassify page-from a page to a category-This should be a category and merged or liked to a bigger category as a link or similar actions should be taken. If that was not possible-deletewholesale.--Quek157 (talk) 13:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such thing as Environmental disciplines. There is a List of environmental issues which seems to be the basis for this page. There are environmental studies and environmental science disciplines. There is already a List of environmental studies topics and environmental science disciplines are a subset of this. -- Alan Liefting-talk- 21:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the entire page.--Quek157 (talk) 09:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, whatever is going to be covered here, could better be covered elsewhere. DJ Creamity^{Oh Yeah!} 21:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 13:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - it's within the realm of being a plausable 'search term'. Redir to List of environmental studies topics. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 04:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that it is not a plausible search item. -- Alan Liefting-talk- 21:39, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete altogether An attempt to get an additional article for what is covered elsewhere. There is no need for a redirect. I can not imagine a long phrase like this as a search term. DGG (talk) 06:51, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.