Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Daytona International Speedway fatalities

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The merge details can be worked out on the article talk page as it's already marked for merging. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 20:39, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Daytona International Speedway fatalities[edit]

Completely unreferenced listcruft. Salad Days 20:50, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or Delete - If references can be given to all of these (or at least the vast majority), it should probably be merged with Daytona International Speedway. Otherwise delete. -WarthogDemon 21:10, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wiki is not a memorial. Ohconfucius 05:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, wikify and reference, the subject of this list is notable, relevant and encyclopedic. I wouldn't object to merging the list into Daytona International Speedway though. A ecis ^{Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984.} 13:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Daytona is notable. Deaths are often notable. Deaths at Daytona? Almost certainly notable. It could be merged, but there's a lot of content on that page already. It does need to be wikified though. FrozenPurpleCube 19:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the scope of this list is rather arbitrary, limiting to fatalities among drivers and participations at race events. Not to mentioned that the entries are unverified.-- danntm ^T _C 22:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I would wonder why drivers and other participants dying at a race track is an arbitrary condition to impose. It would seem obvious to me that those are the people most likely to die there, and limiting the list to those people just seems the reasonable thing to do. Still, I don't know that anybody would object to adding other deaths, if you can verify them. Are there even any other deaths at the track? And if you're worried about sources, I've added some. FrozenPurpleCube 02:20, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Daytona International Speedway. -- Bpmullins | Talk 22:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and cleanup or merge back into Daytona International Speedway. Most of these deaths were considered notable and verification can be found. Sources need to be added. More significant in the sport's history than most "deaths at XXX Speedway", but not necessarily enough for its own breakout article. Barno 16:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Given its prominence in the sport, deaths at Daytona are particularly notable and historical. 205.157.110.11 15:00, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.