Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Coronation Street characters (1976)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was PROCEDURAL CLOSE. Merging all related discussions at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Coronation Street characters (1967) per WP:MULTI. Diego Moya (talk) 11:34, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
List of Coronation Street characters (1976)[edit]
- List of Coronation Street characters (1976) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is far too short on its own. I mean, there is only one character listed here, and thats it. I really don't see why this list should even exist, nor do I think we couldn't just list every single character in the Lists of characters article. EditorEat ma talk page up, scotty! 01:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:58, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:58, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:49, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have notified WikiProject Coronation Street and WikiProject Fictional Characters of this debate. –anemoneprojectors– 09:54, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or merge. 1) I think this would have been best handled under a single nomination, since five similar articles have been nominated for deletion. 2) I don't think it's right to delete them just because there aren't many characters listed. I think it's possible to improve on them, but also they could probably be merged with adjoining years. I don't understand the comment "nor do I think we couldn't just list every single character in the Lists of characters article", and as for Clarityfiend's comment (on the AFD for the 1967 list) that List of Coronation Street characters is in chronological order, that only lists the present characters, and List of past Coronation Street characters is in alphabetical order. –anemoneprojectors– 09:54, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.