Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Christian worship music artists
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. W.marsh 15:11, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
List of Christian worship music artists[edit]
This article is vanity started by Ezmedia[1] to promote his bands. User only has created pages related to his personal self and related bands. This page is a fork because there is already a huge encompassing list of all different types of Christian music genres at List of CCM artists, Category:CCM lists, Category:CCM lists, Category:Lists of musicians, Category: Christian music, and others. This was an effort to promote his personal band Prays and other things like Faithpay. A vanity fork that serves no purpose. Arbustoo 11:25, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Arbustoo 11:25, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Listcruft in current state. If created as promotion there's no chance to get better. Pavel Vozenilek 22:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete listcruft; regardless of how created. KillerChihuahua?!? 00:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, whether promotional or not this article appears to be of interest to very few people, in other words it is listcruft. Stifle 01:56, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep verifiable list of musicians. Jcuk 11:50, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
Johnleemk | Talk 14:20, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Johnleemk | Talk 14:20, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The article doesn't appear to be promotion anymore. Johnleemk | Talk 14:20, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep if it's no longer promotional.--み使い Mitsukai 15:20, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: per Johnleemk's rewrite. Savidan 15:21, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per John Lee's rewrite. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 15:44, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- LOL, I didn't rewrite it. Johnleemk | Talk 17:48, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, useful and not promotional. Kappa 09:36, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.