Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Catholic Businesspersons
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete JtkieferT | C | @ ---- 22:41, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
List of Catholic Businesspersons, List of Catholic Adventurers, List of Catholic Athletes[edit]
This is a collective nomination for three "List of Catholics". Inclusion criteria are overly broad, and the faith of none of those people had an incfuence on their chosen profession. Pilatus 14:58, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Do not categorize members of the lists as Catholic unless they are prominent as followers of Catholicism. Are we going to categorize the entire cricket side of Bangladesh as Muslims, just because Bangladesh is a Muslim country? Pilatus 21:25, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Categorize all members of these lists appropriately, then delete the lists, as with all lists linking profession to religion. See AFDs for List of Jewish publishers, bankers, and criminals. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 15:37, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- There is a point in having a Category:Catholic authors, as there are many writers whose work is influenced by their faith. But why would one wish to categorize athletes of businessmen as adherents of $FAITH? Pilatus 15:45, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Let me clarify what I meant. For example, if it is verified that Pat Croce is catholic, add him to Category:Roman Catholics so this information is not lost. If there is already an appropriate subcategory, move him further down to it. I did not mean create new subcategories based on the list titles above. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 16:25, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- There is a point in having a Category:Catholic authors, as there are many writers whose work is influenced by their faith. But why would one wish to categorize athletes of businessmen as adherents of $FAITH? Pilatus 15:45, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete tribalism. Perodicticus 15:42, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- delete as per nom. DES (talk) 17:57, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Pilatus --TimPope 18:38, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. listcruft --Jaranda(watz sup) 18:42, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete most of the lists that link occupation and religion, with the possible exception of politicians. Youngamerican 19:09, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Categorize people in Category:Roman Catholics and delete. Please note the current lists are miscapitalized. Their occupation is in no way related to their faith. Possible exceptions for politicians, authors and journalists come to mind. - Mgm|(talk) 20:29, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT. Nandesuka 05:18, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or else convert to categories. — RJH 01:09, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Categorify and delete, per Freak. Lists of (religion) (profession) are not encyclopedic, save when the faith has something to do with the profession. (List of priests/rabbi/whatever-term-for-clergy would be encyclopedic, as would a list of writers whose work is influence by their faith.) - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 01:50, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Jtmichcock 03:06, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination 72.144.139.115 21:24, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete same reason as in list of Catholic composers/artists Antidote 23:29, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Edwardian 22:05, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.