Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of British Asian people (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. After three previous no-consensus discussions, we finally have consensus. No valid arguments presented to keep. --MelanieN (talk) 20:47, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of British Asian people[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely unnecessary. This article will never be updated. List of British Pakistanis, British Indians and British Bangladeshis are enough. We don't need this article. $AHLM13$ talk 21:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are already appropriate categories encompassing this. —Мандичка^YO 😜 21:23, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the 4th and 5th, then delete on 6th, restore, then delete again on the 7th clearly notable/non notable category. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:04, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:43, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:44, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:44, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:44, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are already more specific lists, so this article is redundant. Move to Lists of British Asian people, and just list the constituent, specific lists. Pburka (talk) 13:03, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This article is redundant. @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ), I don't understand, why do you want the third one to be deleted? $AHLM13$ talk 14:14, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Same as above. There isn't any necessity to keep this article --115ash^→(☏) 15:49, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Redundant to those articles mentioned above. –Davey2010^Talk 01:49, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.