Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Best Actress winners by age at win
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 00:13, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
List of Best Actress winners by age at win[edit]
Listcruft, of trivial use. Might be merge-able with List of Best Actress winners or somesuch. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 03:09, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Academy Award for Best Actress. Although that article contains the same list (minus the age, which I don't know why anyone would care about), I rather like how this article formats the list into that table. As it stands now, the list in the other article is a colder-looking thing. CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 03:33, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]- On closer inspection Delete. The table here is all out of order. Too much burden to merge. Would make a strange redirect, too. CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 03:36, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- A touch of merge, then delete. The oldest and youngest winners should be mentioned on the main list if not already. Otherwise, this is listcruft. Marskell 12:50, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this serious ListCruft. Deiz 19:40, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge oldest & youngest winners per Marskell, then delete the rest. --Lockley 20:33, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No need to merge the Tandy/Matlin info; it's already in the Academy Award for Best Actress article. Powers 21:49, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Powers. Pavel Vozenilek 01:07, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not needed. --Terence Ong 15:43, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Good, interesting list. Piccadilly 17:07, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Not needed to cure cancer or bring about world peace, but more interesting than 952,131 of Wikipedia's million articles. Scranchuse 21:33, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, very good list, helps answer the question of what age actresses are when they receive most critical acclaim. Kappa 12:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, a relevent article. I find it interesting to know who was the youngest person to win Best Actor, afterward I looked up this article with the same reletive interest. The Filmaker 21:36, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.