Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Australian monotremes and marsupials
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Agent 86 00:41, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
List of Australian monotremes and marsupials[edit]
- List of Australian monotremes and marsupials (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Redundant with list of monotremes and marsupials. Delete UtherSRG (talk) 13:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 04:38, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Redundant, except for the listing of content by continent is generally useful. Redundancy is not a bad thing, and in this case, the specific nature is unique and informative enough that it's acceptable. FrozenPurpleCube 15:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Useful list with sources. Capitalistroadster 04:38, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per FrozenPurpleCube. --Bduke 05:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Taxonomical classification for List of Australian monotremes and marsupials is based on the Australian publication of Menkhorst and Knight. Where as list of monotremes and marsupials is based on the US publication Gardner and Groves. If the two list where to be merge such that the work of Menkhorst and Knight was used to replace the work Gardner and Groves would we not be casting dispersions on the validity of Gardner and Groves. To use solely Gardner and Groves we'd be making the same dispersions on the work Menkhorst and Knight. Gnangarra 06:57, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Groves, the author of the Australian portion in MSW3, lives and works in Australia, but was born in England. He has nothing to do with America. MSW3 is the definitive work. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Something learnt, as Johns Hopkins University is in the US I presumed it was a US publication Gnangarra 13:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Groves, the author of the Australian portion in MSW3, lives and works in Australia, but was born in England. He has nothing to do with America. MSW3 is the definitive work. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Gnangarra. JROBBO 11:38, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per Capitalistroadster --RebSkii 18:41, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Exactly how is Didelphimorphia redundant to a list of Australian monotremes and marsupials? Because of Australia's extraordinarily unique natural history of mammals, deleting this list would simply require an urgent request to create it. KP Botany 19:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.