Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Amiibo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Well I'm not seeing any discussion on the talkpage so I'm closing this as Keep, if anyone wants to redirect I would simply ask they amend this AFD outcome after (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 23:34, 16 September 2015 (UTC) If one notes below, this AfD was withdrawn, and as such there is no result. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 19:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Amiibo[edit]

List of Amiibo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was made in error. There was a discussion to split off content from Amiibo to make this page. There was no consensus, and thus this page was made by a rogue User:ViperSnake151. It should be deleted. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 23:27, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    • Withdrawn by nominator - No one has supported the deletion, and the position of Sergecross73 makes a lot of sense to me. A redirect is a much simpler solution. As the nominator, I am withdrawing this nomination. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 23:54, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect - There was an active discussion on the talk page, and there was no consensus to split it out at this time. (There was a weak consensus against splitting at the time.) Sergecross73 msg me 00:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose speedy close - Discussion occurring in multiple locations, rationale does not propose an outright deletion. And since when is being bold considered "rogue"? ViperSnake151  Talk  00:22, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Splitting a page when doing clearly lacks consensus goes beyond WP:BOLD. Sergecross73 made a similar comment on your talk page. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 03:06, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video games-related deletion discussions. AdrianGamer (talk) 14:29, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • Oppose deletion. Consensus is only necessary when individual judgment is lacking. In this case, a separate list page makes sense. We already have list pages for TV episodes. Let's keep the Amiibo list page, too. — Asgardiator Iä! Iä! 21:16, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        • I think you are misunderstanding. The amiibo list is considered an essential part of Amiibo. There is/was a discussion on the matter of splitting the list into its own article. There was no consensus to split the page, but this one rogue user split the page and made List of Amiibo despite the opposition. Individual judgement does not override a discussion where there was no consensus to split. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 22:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.