Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Alyas Robin Hood characters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:01, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Alyas Robin Hood characters[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Fails WP:NTV, and none of the sources are reliable secondary sources. A good-faith search for coverage by said reliable sources turns up one mention in a single article by the Inquirer.[Inquirer[1]~~ Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 10:49, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A second look at the main article satisfied the need for reliable sources. Though I do still wish to AfD this article, as there is no need for a separate page for the list of character from a nominally popular TV show. Especially considering the fact that a list is already included in the article. I left the above comment, but struck-out to be as transparent as possible. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 10:52, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:22, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:22, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:22, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:22, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:48, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this kind of article should not be created in the first place. It violates WP:LISTCRUFT and the "list" articles does not even expound the content of its main article, rather, it justs forking out the list of characters/guests for a certain Philippine TV show for no reason at all. A bunch of these articles have been recently sprouting like mushrooms and should be reviewed one by one. -WayKurat (talk) 13:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, violates WP:LISTCRUFT ThatGirlTayler (talk) 01:43, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per G5 mass deletion of pages by Kazaro 2607:FB90:6649:C5A8:F0B6:8A5A:EE93:1886 (talk) 15:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Just to comment, this isn't G5 worthy, as the article wasn't created to circumvent a block. Had this been created by a sock, then yes G5 could apply, but not in this case. The user was blocked later one, but that doesn't make this a G5 deletion. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:55, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per above.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.