Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List Of Shows For Kids
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Anas talk? 17:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
List Of Shows For Kids[edit]
- List Of Shows For Kids (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Arbitrary list, original research Gilliam 21:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as purely original research. And what are "kids" in this definition anyway? Two-year-olds? Ten-year-olds? "Kids at heart" (like me)? Young goats? Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 22:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fix or Delete. If the article is renamed as List of Animated Television Shows most of those could stay or List of Sitcoms on Disney Channel, but it needs to be more objective. "For Kids" is completely subjective, I'm 23 and I watch half of those. But perhaps a List of Animated TV shows already exists on Wikipedia and the list is redundant and should be deleted. I'd take a longer look into this before deleting. Useight 22:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)deleteBold text[reply]
- Delete Indiscriminate list with no known target audience. As TPH said, what are "kids" in this case, anyway? AND they don't even have LazyTown. Bastards.--Ispy1981 01:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - the Cosby Show is on this list! That makes it less a list of programmes made for children and more a list of things that children are capable of watching. Anyone who wasn't bred in a laboratory knows that's a big, big list. It's a subjective list of recommended viewing. And condescending too. Kripto 01:15, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 05:10, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NOR, WP:NOT Rackabello 05:53, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 14:55, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Oregongirl0407 02:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.