Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Leyva

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Leyva[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not yet notable according to Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Creative professionals, as a producer, model or actor. She claims to have been involved in the distribution of a successful film, but the reference given doesn't mention her, and I can't find anything online about her as a film producer in secondary sources. There's a photo of her in the article showing her posing with Jack Black, but that doesn't mean they have a working relationship: my brother-in-law got his photo taken posing with James Hetfield and Lars Ulrich, and that does not make him notable in the rock music industry. She had a brief mention as #36 in a 2012 People magazine poll of beautiful women, which doesn't make her notable as a model. She was an extra in one episode of a television show, according to IMDB, which doesn't make her notable as an actor. Her work in film funding and speaking at schools about filmmaking is referenced only by primary sources, and I can't find any secondary coverage of it online. Ruby Murray 09:43, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of independent reliable sources.- Mr X 19:31, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. None of the sources in the article offer significant independent coverage, and I found nothing else that does. --Michig (talk) 10:55, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.