Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Armstrong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close; proposal was for a merge and not deletion. (non-admin closure) – 296.x (talk) 19:04, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Armstrong[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I would suggest a merge into her husband Ant McPartlin's article, unless it can be shown that this Lisa Armstrong is notable enough for an article. I think she is pretty borderline, although she has worked on many notable shows. If the consensus is to keep, I would suggest a page move to Lisa Armstrong (makeup artist) and having this page as a bio for the significantly more notable UK fashion editor/journalist also called Lisa Armstrong (who, from a quick scan/search, seems to have rather a lot more reliable sources on her than the make-up artist). Mabalu (talk) 03:08, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. czar · · 03:26, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. czar · · 03:26, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Mabalu (talk) 12:47, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural close -- This is not an AFD nomination. See WP:MERGE for the correct procedure, which an editor can do without the need to bring it to a forum. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:34, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Basically, what I am suggesting is whether the existing page should be overwritten with another article, which would effectively be a deletion unless the existing subject has sufficent notability for an article (I don't think she is the primary Lisa Armstrong by a long way...) - surely something that merits discussion? Mabalu (talk) 17:09, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel the merge needs discussion, there are steps for proposing a merger rather than simply carrying it out, but I don't believe you need to bring this to AfD unless you actually want the article deleted. – 296.x (talk) 17:17, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.