Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lionel Messi Nyamsi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Hasn't, as yet, played in a fully professional league. There is obviously some interest in the name coincidence but the clear consensus is that the coverage that this has produced is insufficient to meet the relevant notability guidelines. TerriersFan (talk) 22:46, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lionel Messi Nyamsi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Aricle about a footballer who has not played in a fully pro league, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT. All coverage is due to his name, and not significant, meaning the article fails WP:GNG as well. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:54, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:54, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:54, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:54, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:BLP1E. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 22:19, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. BLP1E only applies when the event that the subject relates to has an article of its own, which isn't the case here. The reason for the subject's notability may be quirky and atypical, but I do believe it is valid. Many people will come to wikipedia looking for this article. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 23:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where does BLP1E say that it requires an article for the event? – Kosm1 fent 08:25, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I took it to be implicit in the sentence "In such cases [as this], it is usually better to merge the information and redirect the person's name to the event article", that in order to act on BLP1E, an article about the event in question is required. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 22:44, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's true, but I also see the first bullet, which reads "We should generally avoid having an article on a person [...] if reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event.", which does not imply that it requires an article for the event, and in fact, coverage on this footballer is only in the context of having the same name as Lio Messi. – Kosm1 fent 03:24, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:ONEEVENT. – Pee Jay 23:48, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 12:50, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. What's in a name, anyway? Mattythewhite (talk) 21:29, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP1E and WP:NFOOTBALL. Being named after a worldwide famous footballer does not grant notability. – Kosm1 fent 08:25, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.