Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linux internal commands

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:58, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Linux internal commands[edit]

This article is an inaccurate summary of many articles already found on Wikipedia. Examples: shell (computing), and there is nothing internal about the commands as they were, for quite some time, the main way to use a unix-like system. Psbsub (talk) 04:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This info already exists in several places, and the title of the article isn't something people would search for.

Delete - I don't believe that this is a valid article title. The article tries to describe the fact that some commands are built into the shell, while others are not. However, there is more than one shell available for Linux, and the question of which commands are internal and which are external is much deeper than what we have written here. - Richard Cavell (talk) 05:31, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not even wrong. Shells have internal commands (a topic for shell (computing)), but that has nothing to do with Linux, so this is not even a reasonable name for a redirect. --Itub (talk) 20:23, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm not even sure what does the general term "linux commands" stands for exactly, as intended by the article. List of utility names? File operations supported by the shell? Names of all possible applications? MaxVT (talk) 15:11, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.