Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Links between politics and football

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete article, possibly merge content; I will delete Links between politics and football as it basically lacks content, and redirect both Players and politic and Clubs and politic to Football (soccer) culture so that everyone can merge what's can ba saved from these articles. - Liberatore(T) 18:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Links between politics and football[edit]

Inherently POV. Possibly NPOV content may be merged with Football (soccer) culture. I am also nominating the following related subpages because of the same reason:

– Elisson • Talk 12:36, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

smerge as per nom. Not only largely POV, but also largely OR. Grutness...wha? 13:14, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete them all per nom. POV listcruft. No golden goals here. RGTraynor 17:50, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the verifiable factual bits, but that may not amount to much. AC Milan can hardly be viewed as leftist when they are owned by Silvio Berlusconi. Oldelpaso 17:55, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Theoretically, the relation between soccer teams, their fan sides and political parties could be worth an article; AC Milan does in fact have a group of traditionally left wing supporters, the fossa dei leoni, while Inter was considered the team of the middle class and fascists. See [1] for more on Italian teams. But these articles are useless, so for now, merge. David Sneek 23:10, 4 May 2006 (UTC) p.s.: Maybe some of it can go into Ultras#Politics).[reply]
Delete per nom. Ardenn 04:26, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but not because it is inherently POV if well documented. The articles lack references, though. -- ReyBrujo 22:39, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete them all per RGTraynor. --Ezeu 10:02, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.