Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Link Access Procedures, D channel (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:28, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Link Access Procedures, D channel[edit]

Link Access Procedures, D channel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ages ago (2005) the old AfD got two comments, a merge and a 'keep, it will grow'. Well, 15 years have passed, this stub hasn't grown and is still referenced to primary sources, failing WP:GNG/WP:NSOFT. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:04, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:40, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: @Tony Sidaway to my best understanding you made the user comment on the prior AfD (or equiv) that appears to me to be scoffed in the current nomination. Any comments? Ben-w is also welcome but I am concerned with the Dubs redirects. I'd confess ISBN's 978-0412497308, 9780126914122 and maybe 9783642846632 have useful refs for starters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djm-leighpark (talkcontribs) 2019-05-08T09:54:53 (UTC)
    • Do not forget the whole of chapter 14 § 7 in Roger Freeman's Telecommunication System Engineering, or chapter 6 § 1 of Kessler annd Southwick's ISDN: Concepts, Facilities, and Services. Uncle G (talk) 17:00, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: *Keep: We're finding references. I'd also note LAPDm can merge in here. .. this needs to be primary though. I think we're a bit swamped at AfD/PROD currently though and good work is really difficult. Its not healthly and the miscreants will be the ultimate winners ... its got to be easier on the dark side.Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:50, 12 May 2019 (UTC) I probably got this confused with LPAD.Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:38, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.