Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsey Worsnop
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:43, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lindsey Worsnop[edit]
- Lindsey Worsnop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A subject that appears to be notable only for height or show size. Its a non notable topic only small number of sources are relevant and appears to be a case of WP:BLP1E Blethering Scot 21:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Large feet a a poor criterion for notability.TheLongTone (talk) 22:13, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 07:33, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:19, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete She's not tall enough for List of tallest people and I can't see why we should have an article on someone who's quite tall and has rather big feet. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:42, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.