Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsey Stagg
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:31, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lindsey Stagg[edit]
- Lindsey Stagg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
De prodded, but the external link doesn't actually say anything about her, and neither does anything else. She only ever played this one role, and because it was pre-internet, there's nothing out there. A brief mention in the Adrian Mole article would suffice. Chris (talk) 05:07, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable actress, lacks independent sources as required by WP:N and WP:BIO. --Jayron32 05:58, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sources are available,[1][2] so their lack is not a reason to delete if they can be added through the course of regular editing. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 09:08, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable. No sources and nothing to show any reason to keep. Jmlk17 06:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sources are available,[3][4] so their lack is not a reason to delete if they can be added through the course of regular editing. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 09:08, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as article fails notability criteria for actors. Armbrust Talk Contribs 12:01, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Seems to meet WP:ENT with significant roles in two related productions. Sources are available,[5][6] so their lack is not a reason to delete if they can be added through the course of regular editing. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 09:08, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Yup... the article is in bad shape. So? Seems that is per guideline a surmountable issue. I note that she was in two seperate but related television series: The Secret Diary of Adrian Mole Aged 13 3/4 (7 episodes, 1985-1987), and The Growing Pains of Adrian Mole (6 episodes, 1987). The character of Pandora Braithwaite is a significant role in both these related productions, and her playing a significant role in these two productions squeeks by WP:ENT as multiple... and her part is still being covered in reliable sources even 22 years after the series has ended.[7][8]. Seems she has made it into the enduring record. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 09:08, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.