Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsey Meadows

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lindsey Meadows[edit]

Lindsey Meadows (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and lacks any reliable third party source to pass GNG. Was deprodded without improvement or explanation. Spartaz Humbug! 18:39, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:20, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails PORNBIO without award wins. Fails GNG: no substantial reliable source coverage found in search. • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Totally fails the relevant notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:18, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Fails GNG. Remarkable how porn bios all have horrible sourcing and great pictures, is it not? Carrite (talk) 00:52, 25 March 2014 (UTC) // Wikia is thattaway --->[reply]
  • Delete per nominator's right-on-target analysis. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:45, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails GNG and PORNBIO.LM2000 (talk) 08:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Concur with nominator's assessment. Finnegas (talk) 12:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.