Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Wesley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 04:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Linda Wesley[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite a relatively long career behind the scenes, little reliable and significant information can be found about this singer. Note that the items listed in the article's Discography section, despite being in italics, are actually singles, and over the years she only released four singles of her own and guested on two singles by other people. Otherwise she appears to be mostly a session singer. The article's attempted Google Books citation points to a book page in which she was merely listed as being present at someone else's session. Otherwise she can only be found at typical retail, streaming, and lyrics sites for the few songs in her own name, with no pro reviews or other analysis to qualify for notability as a musician. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 21:03, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 21:03, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No effective coverage. Lots of passing mentions on Gbooks. Fails WP:BIO, WP:MUSICBIO and WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 10:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable singer, does not meet our inclusion criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:32, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.