Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lincoln Station
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 19:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Lincoln Station[edit]
- Lincoln Station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
It was a proposed LRT station, but is currently not planned to be built. Canuck85 (talk) 09:05, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep perhaps the article should mention the fact that it is not currently planned to be built. ZooFari 06:10, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. If the station isn't gonna be built, it's not notable enough for an article. I'd suggest merging to Evergreen Line (Vancouver) but there really isn't anything to merge. BryanG (talk) 06:41, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It was never built, and there are no sources to confirm even that... let alone any kind of notability it might have had as a project. --Chiliad22 (talk) 11:41, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. If it will not be built, then it is most likely not notable. When there are few sources to say even this, then it is definitely not notable. Malinaccier (talk) 16:04, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nonexistent. WillOakland (talk) 17:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.