Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilly light

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:34, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lilly light[edit]

The article does at least say why she should be notable, but as it stands, this does not meet WP:NOTABILITY guidelines. Doubt if it ever will. Prod contested, so here's the AfD. -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 11:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTABILITY. It claims notoriety with one reference that is not considered reliable by WP:RS. OlYeller^Talktome 11:56, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Same reason as mentioned above, not notable. --McSly (talk) 02:09, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.