The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 14:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable --Bottesini 02:24, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as both lacking context and vanity. --Allen 03:01, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nonsense. Fagstein 04:40, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
