Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lili Hayes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SIGCOV is asserted but no sources presented to back this up. Sourcing in the article is mainly novelty coverage and/or unreliable sources, so I don't see that it meets SIGCOV. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lili Hayes[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have doubts about this person. She is a popular Tik Tok bloger and Christina Aguilera mentioned her recently, but all in all it looks like WP:TOOSOON. Not sure that she passes WP:NBIO. Bbarmadillo (talk) 08:05, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Bbarmadillo (talk) 08:05, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:40, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:40, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:40, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:40, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:41, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Yugoslavia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:41, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; sourcing isn't strong enough. Graham87 04:55, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete getting passing mention does not make a person notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:45, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Topic of substantial WP:SIGCOV. gidonb (talk) 15:06, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.