Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilah Parsons (2nd nomination)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jenks24 (talk) 11:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lilah Parsons[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Lilah Parsons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consensus in Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2017 February 15#Lilah Parsons was that the previous discussion was deficient and a relist/redo the warranted remedy. No opinion myself on the propriety. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong Keep - Per everything I said at DRV. Meets WP:BIO and WP:GNG, and definitely passes WP:BASIC. Also meets WP:ENT as she plays a significant role presenting Capital Breakfast. I also provided a few sources at the DRV that would help it establish notability. Lots more web sources are available as well. It could do with some expansion however from those who know more on the subject, as I only created the page based on what I knew of her and what sourced info was available based on the stuff I knew. Had the page failed the criteria I've listed, it would have been CSD'd when first created under A7. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 13:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 13:53, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 13:53, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 13:53, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 14:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So you're saying sources such as [1], [2] [3] [4] [5] and the sources already on the article fail WP:BIO?? There are also loads more mentions and coverage of Parsons on various different reliable secondary sources. Most other presenters have their own article as well. I suggest you read WP:BIO till you know it backwards. The only problem with the article is that it needs expansion with these sources. Would you also care to explain how she isn't notable?Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 18:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Check out WP:JUSTNOTNOTABLE, where it is suggested that "simply stating that the subject of an article is not notable does not provide reasoning as to why the subject may not be notable." North America1000 18:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnpacklambert: Nfitz (talk) 15:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • I still feel this coverage is not the level of indepth coverage in reliable sources we need to pass the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:12, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I disagree, but fair enough. Nfitz (talk) 18:17, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lilah_Parsons_(2nd_nomination)&oldid=1137988580"