Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lihue Christian Church

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 23:59, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lihue Christian Church[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Jenyire2 20:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Jenyire2, as an organization, I think this might qualify for CSD A7, so I went ahead and tagged it. If it gets declined, we could always try PROD too. AFD is the most bureacratic and time consuming of the deletion processes, so in my opinion it's a good habit to try other deletion methods first, when they're applicable. Also, your recent A11 tagging at 2003 Abia gubernatorial election doesn't seem to be invented to me, as Abia does exist in Nigeria. A3 might have been a better tag for that one. Just my opinions though. –Novem Linguae (talk) 20:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 March 2. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unsourced article on a congregation with nothing to suggest it is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I see nothing to suggest that this is not merely a NN local church. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. –Novem Linguae (talk) 16:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete per WP:TNT. Arguably, this is notable, but a totally new article, not a Facebook page, would have to be created from scratch. Bearian (talk) 01:13, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.