Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lights, Camera, Lexi!

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by Disney Junior#Interstitial programming. The article can always be restored if and when better coverage is found to establish notability. SoWhy 11:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lights, Camera, Lexi![edit]

Lights, Camera, Lexi! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nom on behalf of IP after I declined speedy. This is officially neutral, I will !vote below StarM 02:34, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Neutral and essentially expansion of my nomination. I declined this speedy as it didn't fit. The IP has a good point on Talk:Lights, Camera, Lexi! and that's why I completed the AfD for that editor. I'm honestly unfamiliar with notability guidelines as they relate to TV programs but it seems like the viewership might have generated some coverage. I'll be traveling and likely won't have time to research further for sources to add, if indeed there's enough StarM 02:39, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. StarM 02:40, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to List of programs broadcast by Disney Junior#Interstitial programming Unfortunately it is merely a continuity segment on Disney Junior (or Disney Channel's time for it in the mornings) which fills in for what would be usually commercial advertising on another network. It does have a confirmable cite that a million viewers did see it, but other than that sourcing is much thinner than it would be for a full-length series. I'd be willing to see if more sourcing pops up to switch it to a keep, but for now it's just one of many segments DJ uses to put between programs. Nate (chatter) 04:49, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:05, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep more than once this has had over a million viewers, noted this by adding another source in the Broadcast section. This exceeds a lot of other shows which have articles despite their inferior ratings. ScratchMarshall (talk) 03:38, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment "Because it got a Nielsen rating" isn't good enough. We need pure and solid sources as to this interstitial's notability. Nate (chatter) 01:47, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per Nate. I am not in any way affiliated with Ms. Lexi, Disney, or the any part of their plan for world domination. I do expect to get a good reward for sharing a name with the Empress, or at least an honorable mention :) L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 23:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.