Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Light flyweight - Light flyweight
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Discussion of a move/re-name can continue at the article's talk page. Sancho 17:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AIBA African Olympic Boxing Qualifying Tournament 2008 - Light flyweight[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- AIBA African Olympic Boxing Qualifying Tournament 2008 - Light flyweight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Apart from the article being named incorrectly - it really isn't notable. The article doesn't assert the notability and is only about a WP:NN qualification tournament. ScarianCall me Pat 20:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Now moved to a more sensible title. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 06:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 23:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- I think that any qualifying event for the Olympics is notable --SJK (talk) 09:06, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep: I have no idea what it is but it seems to barely fall within regs for notability.--Sallicio 08:21, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but rename (again) why should this focus on only one weight class? AIBA African Olympic Boxing Qualifying Tournament 2008 or 2008 AIBA African Olympic Boxing Qualifying Tournament would be better, and the info from other weight classes could be included. (It's called "AIBA 1st Africa Olympic Qualifying Tournament-Algiers, Algeria" here.) Notability is fairly clear as an Olympic qualifying international tournament, and I've linked some sources that provide coverage.[1] [2] [3] — Scientizzle 17:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.