Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liftbyggarna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Doppelmayr Garaventa Group. – czar 17:28, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Liftbyggarna[edit]

Liftbyggarna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CORP notability unclear, no references excl. the homepage, endorsed PROD removed based on Google search hits. –Be..anyone (talk) 04:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I lost track while I was busy with the Mass de-PROD-ding, and I still want thanks also for Bots and IPs.Be..anyone (talk) 06:04, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge with Doppelmayr Garaventa Group. I confess I used Google translate, but according to the company's website, they were bought out in December 2013.[1] I'm pretty sure that's what happened, anyway. According to this, the company had 6 employees in 2014. I don't think that's reliable, but lacking better sources, it strongly suggests that this company is too small to expect independent notability. A redirect and a couple of sentences on the other article seems appropriate, though. Grayfell (talk) 07:44, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:37, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.