Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liberation psychotherapy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:41, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Liberation psychotherapy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fringe psychology method. It's not an accepted method, there are no studies on it. It is the personal practice of a Christian minister and his wife. The only references in the article are self published books, with two "background references" to Darwin and Frenkl. The YouTube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCuKH50RZcA gives a feel for it, a nice old guy with a few platitudes. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 18:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 July 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:45, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As per WP:FRINGE, there is a need for more coverage than a selection of books from an author who is a proponent of this. I couldn't see anything in PubMed, for example. Notability has not been established. Drchriswilliams (talk) 19:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 06:34, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This reads like an essay, rather than a Wikipedia article. Deletion argument as per nom. Power~enwiki (talk) 04:07, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Presents the theories of a single individual as part of a broader movement within psychotherapy. Everything I found on Google could be traced back to Frank Morris. Famous _dog (c) 07:43, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.