Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liang-Jie Zhang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 03:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Liang-Jie Zhang[edit]

This is apparently an autobiography, and then author has blanked the page twice. I would say it might satisfy WP:CSD#7, as other edits have been small, but numerous, but the page was prodded and declined because of a good showing in Google scholar. The blanking was construed as vandalism, and the user was warned. No independent references are given on the page; perhaps the blanking was because of an error which the author wasn't sure how to get rid of, or some other BLP concern? Thus this person may be notable, and so if someone can improve the page I'm fine with a keep, but I'm not sure anyone ever will and thus suggest deletion; somebody can start an article without a conflict of interest later if they wish. Rigadoun (talk) 21:39, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Espresso Addict (talk) 22:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Various people come after a while and improve pages--someone else who knows the work is likely to look him up and put in the information. --to delete a page because nobody has done so is not the best procedure; the effort is better spent in adding some some additional information. If there was relevant info in GS it should be added, and Ive added at least a little. But he is editor in chief of an iIEEE journal. as these are the highest best journals in the subject, he is unquestionably notable--the criterion of being the ed. ofa major journal has been accepted invariably at Afd for scientists. DGG (talk) 16:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Founding EIC of an IEEE journal seems like enough, but what I see of his pubs in Google scholar looks unimpressive. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 15:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - for being a published author and a founding editor of IEEE TSC. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 19:34, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The frequent editor/creator is Zhanglj which in Pingyin is Zhang Liang Jie. It means that he was creating a page for himself. Good try.TheAsianGURU (talk) 18:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.