Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liana Aghajanian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Star Mississippi 17:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Liana Aghajanian[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not meeting WP:BIO; no reliable independent coverage in news BoraVoro (talk) 13:10, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep: Some coverage unrelated to her employer/where she's written an article: [1], [2], [3]. Probably the SF Chronicle is the best of them, but I think we have enough for an article, but this needs a rewrite. Oaktree b (talk) 15:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, Iran, Armenia, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and improve- per above suggestion/sources. Archives908 (talk) 16:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. We have some independent sources. IMO this firm requirement is already met for this subject, if perhaps at what I'd prefer to think of as a minimal level for a BLP. (I believe that Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing, and I believe that I personally hold somewhat higher standards for creating BLPs than the rest of the community.) In a potentially borderline case, I think Wikipedia should err just slightly on the side of inclusion when the subject is a source (including journalists, newspapers, magazines, academic journals, reference books, and all similar cases). We may someday need to know who this person is to figure out whether something she wrote is itself a reliable source. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:21, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.