Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liam Challenger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete -Greg Asche (talk) 02:35, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Liam Challenger[edit]

Completely non-notable and unencyclopedic. Article seems to claim notability, so I wasn't sure about CSD A7, but "Liam Challenger" produces 3 Google hits, 2 from Wikipedia and another from a site employing Wikipedia content. Delete. Joel7687 00:07, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete No evidence of notability. appears to be vanity posting. Also please note that "Liam Challenger - filmmaker" has been added as a famous person to the Bradford page. This should be removed if the vote doesnt go Liam's way. Bwithh 00:23, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Apparently self-published films for download. I'm sure he's hilarious, but he's not at this point widely discussed in outside sources, so no verification and insufficient notability. Geogre 00:25, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nominator's rationale. -- Saikiri 00:32, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --BorgHunter (talk) 01:05, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unverifiable. Capitalistroadster 02:18, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. NSLE _{(讨论+extra)} 04:50, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unverifiable. Also note that the article claims he made most of his listed films at the age of 12. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 19:50, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.