Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexy Hulme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lexy Hulme[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not really notable LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:46, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep, has some notability and may pass WP:ACTOR, found some sources, Pop Wrapped Interview,she has been covered on a few dance websites as well which I cannot access, and in passing on Perez Hilton, and Daily Entertainment News.Valoem ^talk 15:02, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:17, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not sure passing references in comments on a blog qualify as the sort of source we need to establish notability, and that's largely what I'm seeing in the sources above. I haven't found coverage I believe meets WP:GNG. --j⚛e decker ^talk 18:31, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per she's just an extra, usually a dancer in films, plus there are no primary sources about her. There's one little sentence about her in an Elle article but nothing worth noting. LADY LOTUS • TALK 11:26, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per j*e decker. Just because someone did a Q&A with her doesn't make her notable, and the other sources provided by Valoem don't strike me as putting the subject of this article over the WP:GNG threshold. GRUcrule (talk) 16:28, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.