Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexi Noel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This is a close run thing, but the Keep !votes seem to hinge on this IMEA award which as has been pointed out does not appear to be notable. I have also discounted the !vote from User:J 1982 due to this. Black Kite (talk) 10:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lexi Noel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Award is not major. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:25, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

~~Keep~~: The musician is often confused with a tennis player "Lexi". The artist has coverage in MAJOR reilable sources such as IMDb, OK Magazine, Buzzfeed, among others. The musician meet WP:BASIC and WP:MUSICBIO. As an actor, the subject seems to be a notable actor, since has performed in 2 to 5 major movies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kannox (talk • contribs) 13:39, 16 August 2014 (UTC) — Kannox (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

IMDb is not reliable, OK mag coverage is trivial, BuzzFeed piece is a reader piece with nothing more than a captioned photo. No significant coverage. Her roles as the likes of Niece, Student (uncredited), Wealthy Town Girl (uncredited) and Beachgoer (uncredited) are not significant roles. duffbeerforme (talk) 01:41, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~: The award is not major, but the artist has coverage, and meets WP:MUSICBIO and WP:BASIC. HakPorger (talk) 13:43, 16 August 2014 (UTC) — HakPorger (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: J 1982 (talk) 17:39, 16 August 2014 (UTC) It's still an award.[reply]
~~Keep~~ - References show notability of this artist. AAA3AAA (talk) 09:30, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They do not. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:33, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 18:16, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've struck the keeps above since it's obvious they're SPA's, Cheers, –Davey2010 • (talk) 18:19, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (cackle) @ 21:00, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The page clearly meets WP:MUSICBIO by having such notability, supported by third website. But it needs more citation, references and optimizations. The page should be kept. Fevrret (talk) 01:04, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How does it meet MUSICBIO? Which of the sources do you think are any good? duffbeerforme (talk) 13:43, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okmag, The Trivial Ball.

OK mag coverage is trivial, The Trivial Ball is just the artist talking about herself and is not a reliable source. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kannox, HakPorger and the articles creator have all been blocked as socks. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:43, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article is now Wikipedia's contributors responsibility, so there's no link within the article's creators and the article. Fevrret (talk) 22:18, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. Op47 (talk) 22:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You can't say 'not notable' and do not offer any proof. Fevrret (talk) 15:08, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can and I have. You cannot prove a negative. This article has been re-listed twice to gain further input. I have assessed the article and found the subject to be totaly unworthy of a Wikipedia article. Politeness made me say not notable. Op47 (talk) 11:03, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question - User:Duffbeerforme, presumably most of above are "meatpuppets" as a result of a fan blog appeal rather than actual "socks" per se. Back to sources, is this a hoax? because looks as though there's a base level of teen notability for such a comparison with Cher to even exist. No matter how trivial. Unfortunately we do give article space to five-minutes-of-famers, not sure why this one should be excluded. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:48, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Having a large fan-base worldwide, and featured in many magazines is a way to say that she's gaining spaces. Having an award, nominated and among others, in my opinion she meets the requirements to have such article. Fevrret (talk) 15:08, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Award looks like a non-notable website, even maybe a scam, having said that this is probably a soft keep. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:31, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For User:In ictu oculi, That is from a contributor to Lucky Community, not from the magazine itself. It's not a reliable source. [1]. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:02, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Then Delete - not a single reliable source and a cooked up award to boot. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:15, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - As stated, the musician has a notability and coverage on main webpages. Gained an award. That's why it clearly meets WP:MUSICBIO and WP:BASIC. Having a notable support with celebrities and coached by a major music producer (as said in the article). Fevrret (talk) 15:08, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"coverage on main webpages"?? "Having a notable support with celebrities and coached by a major music producer", nope, notability is not inherited. The "award". An non notable award (IMEA Award) no ones heard of from a non notable organization (International Music and Entertainment Association) given out to predominately non notable artists (Jeremiah Wheeler, Rachel Lipsky, Amy Rose, Highway 55, Courtney Leigh Heinous, Tim Holmes, Isaiah Grass, Tyler Matl, Goodbye Friday, James Ethan Clark, Christy Johnson, Meadows Fortune, Red Box Harbor, Seven Story Fall). Not a major award. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:31, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.