Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexi Lawson (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Enigma^msg 16:13, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lexi Lawson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She has not done anything relevant to increase her notability since either of the last two discussions. JDDJS (talk) 12:33, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It doesn't matter what she's done. All that matters is that significant coverage has been given in independent sources. Since the deletion took place in late 2016, the following articles have been published specifically about her which alone make her meet the WP:GNG: [1], [2], [3] each in the New York Post, and the Playbill interview/article [4]. Miyagawa (talk) 12:59, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article was rightly deleted in 2016, but, since that time, there have been plenty of sources one can easily locate online about its subject. So, the article has been rightly recreated. -The Gnome (talk) 15:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:50, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:50, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She is clearly notable and well documented actor. The page could use some copy-editing and preferably inline citation, but worth keeping for sure. Shushugah (talk) 00:33, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:13, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It seems pretty clear from the references provided that she meets the notability guidelines. Million_Moments (talk) 09:33, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep critical note merits inclusion per NACTOR. The 2009 Rent appearances gained significant note on their own e.g. [5], [6] (by the way, the dates in the article for thisntour must be wrong). ☆ Bri (talk) 20:22, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Passes WP:NACTOR. -- Dane ^talk 02:52, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.