Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lewis Putman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:35, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lewis Putman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was that the article Fails WP:ATH, never played fully-pro. PROD was contested by an IP without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:36, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:37, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 19:57, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - appears to fail WP:GNG as the footballer hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. Some sources do mention the subject but the coverage amounts to routine local coverage. Fails subject-specific notability criteria at WP:NSPORTS as he hasn't played in a fully professional league (WP:FPL). Hack (talk) 20:01, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Fenix down (talk) 19:05, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.