Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lewis Fielding

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz ^talk 23:25, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lewis Fielding[edit]

Articles with this name (or different capitalization, Lewis fielding) have been repeatedly created and then speedily deleted (A7) at least four times, but I can't tell if the current version is similar enough to previous ones to meet speedy deletion criteria G4. This amateur (under-15) player does not appear to meet either WP:BIO or WP:ATHLETE. References listed in the article have at best only a passing mention of the subject and do not support inclusion based on Wikipedia's notability criteria. Peacock (talk) 20:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for not meeting notability criteria. Drmies (talk) 20:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - contested Prod, removed without reason given. Fails WP:Athlete; he gets a page if he plays a competitive first-team game. TerriersFan (talk) 22:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. TerriersFan (talk) 18:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete article about a totally non-notable schoolboy. If the article has been created/speedied so many times, and assuming this AfD results in deletion, suggest salting it. Struway2 (talk) 18:41, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly fails WP:ATHLETE. Giant Snowman 19:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable youth player. Aecis·(away) ^talk 20:13, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable enough. Uksam88 (talk) 20:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can't think of any realistic circumstances in which a player from a pro club's under-15 team would be notable, and this player is no exception. I also find the claim that a leading manufacturer has signed him to an equipment endorsement deal extremely unlikely -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, nothing of note appears. --ClubOranje^T 10:10, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.