Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Les Trophées du Libre (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 07:12, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Les Trophées du Libre[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable award. I can only find links associated with this award. No secondary coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:34, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:34, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:34, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:00, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:52, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have added several new sources. It started with one citation when it was nominated, so it is a case of WP:HEY. Webmaster862 (talk) 09:43, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- But are any reliable sources? Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Articles lists 6 non-trivial references in French press, and it's easy to find more, e.g. [1], [2], [3], etc. Sure, the competition itself remains in the past, but it was widely publicized event back then. GreyCat (talk) 11:08, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per WP:HEY. Some sources were added. It still needs more fonts and more tweaking, but I realized the article has potential notability. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 14:46, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete The event barely meets WP:EVENTCRIT. It doesn't have a lasting effect or significance, it has a limited scope as the coverage is mainly French, the topic is pretty narrow and the coverage itself is mostly routine reporting. —K4rolB (talk) 07:04, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As there are now many French sources in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackattack1597 (talk • contribs) 12:07, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus definately trending towards keep. It should be noted that having multiple sources in French does not indicate it is local in scope, as French is the primary language for a large geographic area, including but not limited to the soverign nation of France. It should also be noted that having "many sources" is not necessarily a good indication of notability, but the quality of those sources matters highly.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There is sufficient coverage of sources. Rondolinda (talk) 19:11, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. "Mainly in French" is about as limited as "mainly in English". Sources have been added. /Julle (talk) 09:28, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.