Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Les Branson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Despite Zenhobo2's comment, the article has not been edited since the AfD nomination.  Sandstein  14:46, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Les Branson[edit]

Les Branson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unpublished poet/novelist; non-notable indy filmmaker. Cited refs are a local-interest, local-man-stages-free-screening-of-film story and a mention that the film won a minor award; I can’t find anything else. There may be just enough claim of significance to pass A7. —teb728 t c 23:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as none of this seems better convincing for the creative entertainers notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:08, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will add more citations and sources at a later date and edit in changes ≈≈≈≈zenhobo2≈≈≈≈ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zenhobo2 (talkcontribs) 19:51, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:15, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.